Re: ONLINE TEACHING/LEARNING.  We believe in science.

Online Teaching/Learning may not be as prudent as many educators and administrators think it is.  One recent scientific study indicates statistically significant differences 3.77** (critical value of t-test 1.99) plus the Effect Size (ES) .-0.92 on Midterm Exam (MT),  Q2, and Q3,  (see below) between regular in-person classes and online.
online teaching/learning may be nothing more than an academic exercise.  Technology can leverage faculty time, but it also can replace human contact.  Other considerations for the instructor might be the following:  How much time would it take to prepare and to maintain the online supplement material?

Table 2   Means, Standard Deviations, t-test Results, and Effect Sizes for Quiz and Examination Data Broken Down for Comparison and Experimental Groups

                       w/o online                                    w/ online
                Comparison Group                     Experimental Group
           (Fa97, Fa99, Fa01, Sp02)            (Fa02, Sp03, Fa03, Sp04)
            ______________________         ______________________      
Test        n        M         SD                          n        M            SD                          df         ES

Q2         37     84.57      8.75                      47     78.17        9.83               3.11**    82      -0.73

Q3         38     73.11     15.47                     47     64.40      16.49               2.49*      83      -0.56

MT        39     86.39      6.36                      47     80.51        7.82               3.77**    84      -0.92

Show the statistical significance of  INPERSON (
w/o online)  vs  ONLINE (w/ online).


The statistical significance of Group one and Group two is indicated by the t-value and the associated p-value. From the table you provided, the t-value for the comparison between Group one (M=86.39, SD=6.36, n=39) and Group two (M=80.51, SD=7.82, n=47) is 3.77 with df=84 and a p-value of **0.001.
Since the p-value is less than the conventional alpha level of 0.05, we can conclude that there is a statistically significant difference between the two groups.

OK. then tell us the Effect Size of the t-value.

The effect size of the t-value (3.77) for the comparison between Group one (n=39, M=86.39, SD=6.36) and Group two (n=47, M=80.51, SD=7.82) is -0.92. The effect size is calculated using Cohen's d, which is a measure of the standardized difference between the means of two groups. In this case, a negative effect size indicates that Group one had a higher mean than Group two, and the magnitude of the effect size suggests a large difference between the two groups. Specifically, a Cohen's d of -0.92 indicates that the mean of Group one was approximately 0.92 standard deviations higher than the mean of Group two.

Tell us approx what percentage of the students did perform higher in the inperson class.

Based on the information provided, we can see that the mean score for Group one (in-person class) is 86.39 with a standard deviation of 6.36, while the mean score for Group two (online class) is 80.51 with a standard deviation of 7.82.
The t-value for the independent samples t-test is 3.77 with 84 degrees of freedom. Using Cohen's d to calculate the effect size, we get a value of -0.92.
To estimate the percentage of students who performed higher in the in-person class, we need to define a cutoff point. Assuming that a difference of 2 points in the exam score is considered meaningful, we can calculate the percentage of students who scored 2 or more points higher in the in-person class.
To do this, we need to calculate the difference in means between the two groups divided by the pooled standard deviation:
d = (86.39 - 80.51) / sqrt(((39-1)(6.36)^2 + (47-1)(7.82)^2) / (39 + 47 - 2)) d = 5.88 / 1.54 d = 3.82
Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find that the proportion of students who performed 2 or more points higher in the in-person class is approximately 98.3%.

Details available at

= end =