Updated 24/1
Telephone 415-928-9608

SOKO GAKUEN
STUDENT RESOURCE CENTER

ADVISEMENT INFORMATION REPOSITORY

STUDENT GRADES & INFORMATION

<< Previous page
 
TO ASSURE CONFIDENTIALITY, ALL STUDENTS ARE IDENTIFIED BY THEIR PHONE/DOB (last4digits/mmdd).
If requested, a certificate of course completion will be issued to the student who has successfully completed 
a course or courses (i.e., a final exam score of 80% or higher & an attendance rate of 80% or higher). 
Requests can be addressed to sokogakuen@gamil.com.

FALL 2023

COURSE
ID Phone/DOB    ExamScore%,  Attendance(%)
last 4 digits  mmdd


 Final Exam Date:   Saturday, 12/2/23

BCSM   (Instructor:  Y. Kosaka)
9781/0216  100.0%  8/11(73%)
2350/0603  100.0%  9/11(82%)
6677/0627    98.5%  9/11(82%)
1989/0822    68.5%  11/11(100%)
8300/0819    94.5%  9/11(82%)
5242/1205    95.0%  9/11(82%)
2518/1028    89.0%  8/11(73%)
0210/0530    56.5%  9/11(82%)
0828/0808    88.5%  8/11(73%)
2057/1080    58.5%  8/11(73%)



B1SM   (Instructor:  Y. Uda)

6871/0914 91.4%  11/11 (100%)

8498/1004 98.3%  11/11 (100%)

1901/0329 92.9%  10/11 (91%)

1989/0408 99.7%  11/11 (100%)

6441/1106 99.2%  10/11 (91%)

6141/0821 95.6%  10/11 (91%)

1005/0809 98.1%  10/11 (91%)


B2SM   (Instructor:  S. Halper)
4319/0805   80.0%     9/11 (82%)
3063/0706   86.2%   10/11 (91%)
0411/0831   95.8%   11/11 (100%)
0214/0617   92.2%   11/11 (100%)
6565/0517   96.3%   11/11 (100%)
9189/0318   99.5%     9/11 (82%)
8955/1011   89.8%   11/11 (100%)
9785/0202   92.0%   10/11 (91%)


B3SM  (Instructor:  H. Rustigan)
8379/0521   90.9%  10/11(91%)
8345/0819   94.8%  10/11(91%)
 


 
B1SA   Instructor:  H. Rustigan
5663/0202   94.0%   11/11(100%)
3836/1112   94.9%   11/11(100%)
6677/0627   97.2%   11/11(100%)

ICSA   (Instructor:  Y. Higashino)
2244/0610   92.8%     7/11 (64%)
0770/1101   99.5%    11/11 (100%)
5890/1129   96.3%      9/11 (82%)
6516/1015   91.8%      5/11 (45%)
4668/0417   92.0%    10/11(91%)
8009/1119   86.0%     11/11 (100%)
8834/0511   96.8%    10/11( 91%)


I1SA   (Instructor:  S. Halper)
9919/0120   90.5%   10/11 (91%)
8229/0105   91.8%   10/11 (91%)
8276/0528   87.3%   11/11 (100%)
6600/0102   94.5%   10/11 (91%)
2108/0402   99.7%   11/11 (100%)
3187/0407   90.8%   11/11 (100%)
6339/1022   87.0%   11/11 (100%)
8253/1003   81.5%     8/11 (73%)


I2SA  (Instructor:  M. Ota)
5068/0617  88.3%     7/11 (64%)
0138/0114  87.2%   10/11 (91%)
5143/0817  88.7%   10/11 (91%)
1050/1209  96.8%   11/11 (100%)


I3SA  (Instructor:  Y. Kosaka)
9229/0808  93.9%    8/11(73%)
9698/0917  98.4%  10/11(91%)
4882/0128  98.0%  10/11(91%)
8874/1007  99.4%  10/11(91%)
2931/5127  83.5%    8/11(73%)


I4SA    --canceled--  
 

I6SA    (Instructor:  R. Kondo)
7580/1021   98.8%     9/11(82%)
8677/0808   89.6%   10/11(91%)
4749/0723   97.4%   11/11(100%)   
5921/0304   97.1%     8/11(73%)
0357/0626   94.4%     9/11(82%)
9781/0129   95.8%   11/11(100%)   
8143/0405   93.2%     7/11(64%)  
5063/0124   96.4%   11/11(100%)
5661/0115   95.0%     8/11(73%)
8405/1024   91.0%   11/11(100%)




JLPTn3&k SA   --canceled--   


PCSA   --canceled--   


JLPTn2 SA   (Instructor:  Y. Komori) 
8462/0929  94%   9/11(82%)
8728/----    72%   8/11(73%)
7900/1007 76%   8/11(73%)
6102/0116 72%   8/11(73%)



 Final Exam Date:   Monday, 12/4/23 

B1ME   (Instructor: Y. Komori)
3038/1008 97% 10/11 (91%)
4632/0511 92%   8/11 (73%)
2396/1226 91% 11/11 (100%)
9648/0926 94%   9/11 (82%)
8619/0113 96%   9/11 (82%)
8771/0716 97% 10/11 (91%)
3382/0814 96% 10/11 (91%)


B2ME   (Instructor:  M. Ota)
9580/0327 100%  10/11 (91%)
8009/1119   88%   10/11 (91%)
1110/0517   84%   11/11 (100%)
8180/1211   98%   11/11 (100%)
5680/0415   79%   10/11 (91%)


I2ME     (Instructor:  H. Rustigan)
9969/0512   88.9%  10/11 (91%)
1778/0126   96.7%    9/11 (82%)
2550/0430   81.9%  10/11 (91%)
1172/0116   74.6%   10/11 (91%)
6088/1127   92.1%   11/11 (100%)
2638/0108   84.6%   10/11 (91%)
7852/0602   89.6%   10/11 (91%)
8124/1202   85.6%     9/11 (82%)
0711/0514   84.5%   10/11 (91%)


I3ME      (Instructor:  Y. Higashino)
0581/0309   96%  11/11(100%)
5139/1226   98%    9/11 (82%)
1258/0607   95%  10/11 (91%)

JLPTn5&k1 ME    --canceled--

JPLTn4&k2 ME     --canceled--


I5ME     (Instructor:  A. Kazama)
8331/1229   95.7%  11/11(100%)
3938/0826   87.7%  10/11(91%)
7961/1201   84.7%  10/11(91%)
4211/0421   97.2%    8/11(73%)
1353/0421   82.8%    8/11(73%)




   Final Exam Date: Wednesday, 12/6/23

B1WE  (Instructor:  Y. Higashino)
1950/0314   80%    7/11 (64%)
2745/0216   94%    9/11 (82%)
9474/0101   87%    9/11 (82%)
6876/0504   97%  10/11 (91%)
8215/1006   93%  11/11 (100%)  
7891/0816   80%    6/11 (55%)
0210/0530   53%  10/11 (91%)
0858/0102   98%    4/11 (36%)
1280/0506   99%    4/11 (36%)
4846/0127   98%  10/11 (91%)


B2WE   (Instructor:  M. Ota)
3239/0724    94%     7/11 (64%)
8360/1004    93%   10/11 (91%)
5545/0519    70%   10/11 (91%)
9668/0722    90%   10/11 (91%)
6876/0602  100%   10/11 (91%)


B3WE   (Instructor:  H. Rustigan)
2265/0321   94.4%   11/11 (100%)    
9255/0204   82.3%     7/11 (64%)   
0064/0130   76.8%     9/11 (82%)   
3953/0922   72.5%     7/11 (64%) 
   

I1WE     (Instructor:  A. Kazama)
4101/0827   97.2%    9/11(82%)
0831/0811   95.1%    6/11(54%)
8471/1126   89.4%    9/11(82%)
2755/0125   81.5%  10/11(91%)
9305/0905   91.9%  11/11(100%)
1560/0428   91.1%  10/11(91%)
2523/0629   89.3%    9/11(82%)


I2WE     --canceled--




Notes:
1.
  ----  (dashes)   Cells could not be filled because data were not obtained or were not reported.
2.   (blank cells)   Data were not applicable (N/A), or have not been reported.

3.   The above grades and attendance were issued to the students who have successfully completed  a course or courses, i.e., a final exam score of 80% or higher and an attendance rate of 80% or higher.



お願い To our dear students and ex-students:
Soko Gakuen teachers make a monthly stipend that covers just their needs.  Over the last 30 years, we have made conscious efforts to keep our tuition below comparable market rates based on Buddhist principles.  Over a decade later, it's the only top-three language school run by a nonprofit organization, and a community of passionate volunteer-minded workers.  We ask for a small donation of  $10, $25, $50, (or more if you can).  Your donation will only be used to cover teachers' bonuses (restricted contribution).  Our school has served over a thousand people learning Japanese every year, but we run on a fraction of what other schools spend.  Please, if you can, help us support our school by giving a little more money to our teachers. Our teachers will really appreciate it. Thank you.
   Your generous CHECKS, PAYABLE TO  Soko Gakuen, 1881 Pine Street, San Francisco, CA 94109.

hatumode.gif


symbol.gif  Mission Statement
Take a close look at the sites: Craigslist, Jim Breen, Soko Gakuen, etc. What do they share in common? You'd think you'd stepped into a time machine that has shot you back to the Web's pre-commercial days? Mosaic, NCSA, Marc Andreessen? There are no fancy graphics. No flashy animation. No banner ads. There's hardly even color. It has all the appeal of an elementary school mimeograph. And that's by design.  Stay true to its original "populist values” that draw people together.  Online communities change over time. Simple and fast is good, Craig Newmark agrees, because it makes the site easy to use. This practice will help people make life easy. And provide a culture of trust, one that's very useful and very effective. "Ostentation and ornamentation are disdained as vulgar, and simplicity and understatement considered as signs of sophistication (Zen)." Think why people tweet on X?   Prajna.  円融三諦

Comments or suggestions to sokogakuen@gmail.com.

<<  Previous page



<<< Home   -   Enrollment Information  -  Class Schedule  -  Course Descriptions  -  Evaluation and Exams  -  Scholarships  -  Faculty  -  Directions to Soko Gakuen  -  EXTRA!

Editor: SeaMonkey/2.48
 

- end of file -
 
















EXTRA
onlineVinpersonLearning

Updated 24/1
                                 


Re: ONLINE TEACHING/LEARNING.  Empirical evidence behind online teaching.

Online Teaching/Learning" may not be as prudent as many educators and administrators think it is.  One recent scientific study indicates statistically significant differences 3.77** (critical value of t-test 1.99) plus the Effect Size (ES) .-0.92 on Midterm Exam (MT),  Q2, and Q3,  (see below) between regular in-person classes and online.
…… online teaching/learning may be nothing more than an academic exercise.  Technology can leverage faculty time, but it also can replace human contact.  Other considerations for the instructor might be the following:  How much time would it take to prepare and to maintain the online supplement material?


Table 2   Means, Standard Deviations, t-test Results, and Effect Sizes for Quiz and Examination Data Broken Down for Comparison and Experimental Groups

                       w/o online                                    w/ online
                Comparison Group                     Experimental Group
           (Fa97, Fa99, Fa01, Sp02)            (Fa02, Sp03, Fa03, Sp04)
            ______________________        _____________________    
                                                    
Test        n        M         SD                          n        M           SD                    t           df        ES

Q2         37     84.57      8.75                      47     78.17        9.83               3.11**    82      -0.73

Q3         38     73.11     15.47                     47     64.40      16.49               2.49*      83      -0.56

MT        39     86.39      6.36                      47     80.51        7.82               3.77**    84      -0.92






Show the statistical significance of INPERSON vs ONLINE.

INPERSON CLASS STUDENTS PERFORMED (98%) BETTER THAN ONLINE CLASS STUDENTS.

The statistical significance of Group one and Group two is indicated by the t-value and the associated p-value. From the table you provided, the t-value for the comparison between Group one (M=86.39, SD=6.36, n=39) and Group two (M=80.51, SD=7.82, n=47) is 3.77 with df=84 and a p-value of **0.001.
Since the p-value is less than the conventional alpha level of 0.05, we can conclude that there is a statistically significant difference between the two groups.

OK. then tell us the Effect Size of the t-value.

The effect size of the t-value (3.77) for the comparison between Group one (n=39, M=86.39, SD=6.36) and Group two (n=47, M=80.51, SD=7.82) is -0.92. The effect size is calculated using Cohen's d, which is a measure of the standardized difference between the means of two groups. In this case, a negative effect size indicates that Group one had a higher mean than Group two, and the magnitude of the effect size suggests a large difference between the two groups. Specifically, a Cohen's d of -0.92 indicates that the mean of Group one was approximately 0.92 standard deviations higher than the mean of Group two.

Tell us approx what percentage of the students did perform higher in the inperson class.

Based on the information provided, we can see that the mean score for Group one (in-person class) is 86.39 with a standard deviation of 6.36, while the mean score for Group two (online class) is 80.51 with a standard deviation of 7.82.
The t-value for the independent samples t-test is 3.77 with 84 degrees of freedom. Using Cohen's d to calculate the effect size, we get a value of -0.92.
To estimate the percentage of students who performed higher in the in-person class, we need to define a cutoff point. Assuming that a difference of 2 points in the exam score is considered meaningful, we can calculate the percentage of students who scored 2 or more points higher in the in-person class.
To do this, we need to calculate the difference in means between the two groups divided by the pooled standard deviation:
d = (86.39 - 80.51) / sqrt(((39-1)(6.36)^2 + (47-1)(7.82)^2) / (39 + 47 - 2)) d = 5.88 / 1.54 d = 3.82
Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find that the proportion of students who performed 2 or more points higher in the in-person class is approximately 98.3%.



Details available at
https://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/y.shimazu/withOrWithoutOnline.html
https://works.bepress.com/y_shimazu/1

https://sjsunews.com/article/spartans-say-zoom-classes-lack-quality-


= end =




Show the statistical significance of group 1 (inperson) and group 2 (online):
Test        n        M          SD                     n        M           SD                  t             df        ES     
Q2         37     84.57      8.75                  47     78.17        9.83               3.11**    82      -0.73
Q3         38     73.11     15.47                 47     64.40      16.49               2.49*      83      -0.56
MT        39     86.39      6.36                  47     80.51        7.82               3.77**    84      -0.92


ChatGPT
Based on the provided data, it seems you have conducted independent samples t-tests to compare the means of two groups (in-person teaching and online teaching) on three different measures: Q2, Q3, and MT. The statistical significance of the comparisons is indicated by the t-values and the associated degrees of freedom (df). Additionally, the effect size (ES) is also provided.
Here are the results of the statistical significance tests for each measure:
Q2:
    •    Group 1 (in-person teaching): n = 37, M = 84.57, SD = 8.75
    •    Group 2 (online teaching): n = 47, M = 78.17, SD = 9.83
    •    t-value = 3.11**
    •    df = 82
    •    Effect Size (ES) = -0.73

Q3:
    •    Group 1 (in-person teaching): n = 38, M = 73.11, SD = 15.47
    •    Group 2 (online teaching): n = 47, M = 64.40, SD = 16.49
    •    t-value = 2.49*
    •    df = 83
    •    Effect Size (ES) = -0.56

MT:
    •    Group 1 (in-person teaching): n = 39, M = 86.39, SD = 6.36
    •    Group 2 (online teaching): n = 47, M = 80.51, SD = 7.82
    •    t-value = 3.77**
    •    df = 84
    •    Effect Size (ES) = -0.92

The t-values indicate the magnitude of the difference between the means of the two groups, while the associated p-values determine the statistical significance. In your provided information, the asterisks (*) and double asterisks (**) indicate the significance levels, with * representing p < 0.05 and ** representing p < 0.01.
Based on the results given, Q2, Q3, and MT all show statistically significant differences between the in-person teaching group and the online teaching group. The effect sizes (ES) provide an estimate of the magnitude of the differences observed between the groups.
Please note that without the raw data or further information, it is not possible to provide more detailed interpretation or context for these results.



=end=